Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| -- | 2016-09-01 |
| -- | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| -- | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a score of 90.7, which is better than Moto Z Force's score of 75.8. Both phones in this comparison work with Android operating system, but Galaxy S25 Ultra has an older 14 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a notably lighter and notably thinner phone than the Moto Z Force.
Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a more vivid display than Moto Z Force, because although it has a quite worse quantity of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a larger display and a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px. Moto Z Force counts with a better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Moto Z Force features a much powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has less cores (but faster) and less RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra takes much better pictures and videos than Moto Z Force, because it has a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality, a lot better 200 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and video in poorly lited situations.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a way better battery life than Moto Z Force, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.