Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-06-29 |
| -- | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| -- | 5.11 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a general score of 90.7, which is much better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play's score of 77.4. The Galaxy S25 Ultra construction is way thinner and a lot lighter than Motorola Moto Z2 Play. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a way better looking display than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen, a lot higher 1440 x 3088px resolution and a larger screen.
Motorola Moto Z2 Play features an extremely better CPU than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy S25 Ultra captures way better photos and videos than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a way higher video quality and a much more mega pixels back facing camera.
The Moto Z2 Play counts with a bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a really longer battery life than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 67 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.