Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-29 |
| -- | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| -- | 5.50 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.74 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a score of 90.7, which is better than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play's 76.3 global score. Galaxy S25 Ultra's design is notably lighter and thinner than Motorola Moto Z3 Play. Motorola Moto Z3 Play counts with a much faster CPU than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a bit larger display, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a quite better pixels density. The Moto Z3 Play counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a way better battery life than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3000mAh. Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots way better photographs and videos than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a back facing camera with a way better 200 MP resolution and a lot better 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.