Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2020-09-18 |
| -- | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.30 ounces |
| -- | Oxford blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is slightly better than Motorola One 5G, with a general score of 90.7 against 84.6. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a way lighter and way thinner phone than Motorola One 5G. Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much more vibrant screen than Motorola One 5G, because it has a just a bit greater pixels amount per inch of display, a bit bigger screen and a better 1440 x 3088 resolution.
Motorola One 5G counts with a quite bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola One 5G has a very superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Motorola One 5G counts with a battery lifetime that's very similar to the battery performance in Galaxy S25 Ultra. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots way better videos and photos than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution, a back camera with a lot higher resolution and a way bigger back camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.