Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-09-23 |
| -- | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 8.01 ounces |
| -- | Polar night |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.74 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has an overall score of 90.7, which is much better than Nokia 8.3 5G's 80.5 score. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has 14 version while Nokia 8.3 5G has Android 11 version, giving you some additional features and performance tweaks. The Galaxy S25 Ultra construction is noticeably lighter and much thinner than Nokia 8.3 5G.
The Nokia 8.3 5G has a really superior processing power than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much better looking screen than Nokia 8.3 5G, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution and a better number of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra captures way better photos and videos than Nokia 8.3 5G, because it has a way higher video quality, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photography and videos, a way larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality pictures and a much higher 200 MP resolution back facing camera.
Nokia 8.3 5G counts with a bit more memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB. Galaxy S25 Ultra features a bit longer battery performance than Nokia 8.3 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.