Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-04-29 |
| -- | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| -- | 6.60 ounces |
| -- | Prism cube black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, getting a global score of 90.8 against 90.7. Both phones we are comparing here work with Android operating system, but Galaxy A51 5G has older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has Android 14. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a much greater processing power than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a way better looking display than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a quite larger display, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a little greater amount of pixels in each inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much better camera than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a camera in the back with much more MP, a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light images, a much higher video quality and a much bigger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.