Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-09-01 |
| -- | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.67 ounces |
| -- | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s has a global score of 91.1, which is a little bit better than Galaxy S25 Ultra's general score of 90.7. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A52s has 11 version while Galaxy S25 Ultra has Android 14 version. Galaxy S25 Ultra features a way better looking display than Galaxy A52s, because it has a bit larger screen, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a little greater pixel number in each screen inch.
The Galaxy A52s has a much greater performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 6 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 1 TB.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy A52s, because it has a back camera with a lot better 200 megapixels resolution, a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light captures and videos, a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking lot better quality photographs and videos and a much better 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.