Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-02-22 |
| -- | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| -- | 7.69 ounces |
| -- | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 501 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.74 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better than Galaxy F62, with a 90.7 score against 88.1. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has newer 14 version and Galaxy F62 has Android 11, so it counts with a couple additional features. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra's construction is way lighter and a lot thinner than the Galaxy F62.
The Galaxy F62 has a much powerful CPU than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM and 4 less CPU cores (but faster). Galaxy S25 Ultra has a way better screen than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has much more brightness, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088, a quite bigger display and more pixels per inch of display.
Galaxy S25 Ultra captures a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy F62, because it has a larger aperture to capture better captures and videos in low-light environments, a lot larger sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality, a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a much more mega pixels camera.
The Galaxy F62 has a better memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 1 TB. Galaxy F62 has a superior battery performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.