Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| -- | 2019-03-07 |
| -- | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.14 ounces |
| -- | Black and Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.74 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is better than Galaxy M30, getting a 90.7 score against 82.4. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy S25 Ultra has the previous 14 version while Galaxy M30 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Galaxy S25 Ultra design is way lighter and incredibly thinner than the Galaxy M30.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a way better display than Galaxy M30, because it has a greater pixel amount in each inch of screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a quite larger screen. Galaxy M30 features a much more powerful CPU than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy M30 has slightly more memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy S25 Ultra takes much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy M30, because it has a camera in the back with a much better resolution, a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light captures and video, a way higher video resolution and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality photos.
Galaxy S25 Ultra and Galaxy M30 both count with similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.