Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| -- | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, with a 98.9 score against 90.7. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an older 13 version while Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has Android 14. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a more vivid display than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1440 x 3088px, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also counts with a bit higher pixels count in each display inch.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much better performing processing unit than Galaxy S25 Ultra. Both of them have 8 cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, and although they both have the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a larger aperture, a larger sensor capturing better quality photographs and videos, a back camera with much more MP and faster video frame rates.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features just a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.