Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.2 |
| -- | 2013-09-25 |
| -- | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than Galaxy Note3, having a overall score of 90.7 against 77.7. Both devices in this comparison come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has the previous 14 version while Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a way thinner and way lighter cellphone than the Galaxy Note3.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a greater display pixel density, a larger display and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy Note3 counts with a much greater performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 4 lesser cpu cores and lesser RAM memory. Galaxy S25 Ultra captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Note3, because it has a lot larger aperture, a way more MP camera, a way better 7680x4320 video quality and a lot larger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.