Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2016-08-02 |
| -- | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.96 ounces |
| -- | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.74 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a general score of 90.7, which is much better than the Galaxy Note7's score of 79.5. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a thinner and notably lighter device than the Galaxy Note7. Samsung Galaxy Note7 features a way better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 8 GB less RAM and 4 less cores.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a lot better display than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a bit lower pixels number in each inch of screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a larger screen. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy Note7, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a camera with a much better resolution, a lot larger camera sensor shooting much better quality photos and a lot higher video quality. The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a way better battery performance than Galaxy Note7, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.