Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2020-02-03 |
| -- | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 6.56 ounces |
| -- | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 501 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, having a global score of 90.7 against 89.7. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra construction is notably thinner and lighter than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has a better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution, a bit bigger display and more pixels per display inch.
Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a way better performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality, a larger diafragm aperture, a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a back facing camera with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.