Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2016-06-10 |
| -- | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| -- | 6.53 ounces |
| -- | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a general score of 90.7, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's global score of 75.8. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a thinner and lighter cellphone than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a little bit lower display pixels density, it also counts with a much brighter display, a much bigger screen and a slightly better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy S7 Active features a very superior processing unit than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has less cores and less RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has improved battery duration than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution and a back camera with a lot better 200 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.