Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| -- | 2016-03-11 |
| -- | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.54 ounces |
| -- | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than Galaxy S7 edge, with a global score of 90.7 against 78.1. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has an older 14 version while Galaxy S7 edge has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra's design is way lighter and a lot thinner than Galaxy S7 edge.
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has a much more powerful processor than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has lesser cpu cores (although faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a little less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a larger screen.
Galaxy S25 Ultra captures way better photos and videos than Galaxy S7 edge, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a much bigger back camera sensor taking way better quality photos, a way higher 7680x4320 video quality and a much more mega pixels camera. Galaxy S25 Ultra has a way bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a very superior battery duration than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.