Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-03-12 |
| -- | 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| -- | 6.07 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.74 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is better than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, getting a 90.7 score against 78.1. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has the newer 14 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 has Android 11. Galaxy S25 Ultra's construction is a lot lighter and notably thinner than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 5.
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 has a much faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much sharper screen than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a larger screen, a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a much greater display pixel density.
Galaxy S25 Ultra captures greater photos and videos than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a larger aperture to capture better low-light images and video, a much better 200 megapixels resolution back camera and a much better video definition. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a slightly bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.