Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| -- | 2020-04-04 |
| -- | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| -- | 9.03 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | -- |
| 501 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.74 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a general score of 90.7, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's global score of 80.1. The Galaxy S25 Ultra design is notably lighter and notably thinner than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro. These devices include Android operating system, but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has the older 14 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a just a bit lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a lot bigger screen and a little higher 1440 x 3088 resolution. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much greater hardware performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low-light photography and videos, it also counts with a lot higher 200 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, a way better video resolution and a much larger sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photos.
Galaxy S25 Ultra features a bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with just a bit better battery life than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an 11% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.