Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-01-31 |
| -- | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| -- | 7.76 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a score of 90.7, which is better than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's global score of 81. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a incredibly thinner and lighter device than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro. Both devices we compare here include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has the newer 14 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 version, so it provides the user some nice extra features and performance tweaks.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a much faster CPU than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much more vibrant display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a little higher display pixels density, a little bigger display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a lot more MP back-facing camera, a much bigger sensor and a way better 7680x4320 video definition. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a better memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with improved battery duration than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 23 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.