Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-08-11 |
| -- | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.74 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is just a bit better than Galaxy Z Flip 3, getting a 90.7 score against 85.6. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has the newer 14 version while Galaxy Z Flip 3 has Android 11. The Galaxy S25 Ultra design is noticeably thinner and notably lighter than Galaxy Z Flip 3.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a lot better processing power than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a way better looking display than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088, a little bit larger display and a quite greater amount of pixels per screen inch.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a larger camera aperture and a camera in the back with a lot better 200 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.