Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-07 |
| -- | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a score of 92.3, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra's 90.7 overall score. Both devices in this review have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has Android 14. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features an incredibly better screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a quite better pixel density, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a quite larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and the Galaxy Z Flip 5G have incredibly similar memory capacity for apps and games, both of them have the same 256 GB internal storage. Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a much more powerful CPU than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy S25 Ultra captures a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a lot higher video resolution, a lot better resolution back-facing camera, a larger diafragm aperture and a much bigger sensor taking lot better quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.