Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-09-18 |
| -- | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| -- | 9.95 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra's 90.7 overall score. Both phones in this review include Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has Android 14. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a way better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1440 x 3088 resolution and a better screen pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a lot better performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and a 12 GB RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Fold 2's memory capacity for games and applications is very similar to Galaxy S25 Ultra's one, they have the same 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a way more MP back facing camera, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos, a lot bigger sensor taking much higher quality videos and photographs and a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.