Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-08-11 |
| -- | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| -- | 9.56 ounces |
| -- | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.74 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a score of 90.7, which is a bit better than Galaxy Z Fold 3's 90.6 overall score. Galaxy S25 Ultra's construction is a lot lighter and notably thinner than the Galaxy Z Fold 3. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S25 Ultra has a newer 14 version and Galaxy Z Fold 3 has Android 11, counting with a lot of extra features and performance optimizations.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a way better looking display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and more pixels per inch of screen. Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a very superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra. Both have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with as much memory capacity to install games and applications as the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, both of them have exactly the same internal memory. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a way larger aperture for better captures and videos in low light situations and a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.