Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-03-28 |
| -- | 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.23 ounces |
| -- | Black and Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a global score of 90.7, which is better than Xiaomi Black Shark 2's global score of 82.3. Both phones we are comparing work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has a more recent 14 version and Xiaomi Black Shark 2 has Android 10, so it gives you a couple additional features and a performance increase. The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a a lot lighter and way thinner device than Xiaomi Black Shark 2.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 has a much powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a way better looking screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, because it has much more display brightness, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088, a little larger screen and a little higher pixels quantity in each display inch.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much better camera than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a lot more mega-pixels back camera, a larger diafragm aperture and a lot larger camera sensor. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a very superior memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy S25 Ultra features better battery duration than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.