Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-08 |
| -- | 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches |
| -- | 7.83 ounces |
| -- | Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra has an overall score of 90.7, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Black Shark 3's score of 86.6. The Galaxy S25 Ultra construction is way thinner and notably lighter than Xiaomi Black Shark 3. These phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy S25 Ultra has a more recent 14 version and Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has Android 10.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with a really superior hardware performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much sharper screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has a better 1440 x 3088 resolution, more pixels per display inch and a little bit larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a very superior memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a bit better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Galaxy S25 Ultra captures much clearer pictures and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has a way better 7680x4320 video definition, a lot more mega-pixels camera, a much bigger camera sensor which provides a much higher photo and video quality and a larger camera aperture for better captures and video in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.