Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-05-06 |
| -- | 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.41 inches |
| -- | 7.41 ounces |
| -- | Mirror Black and Pale Grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | -- |
| 501 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 4, getting a 90.7 score against 88.3. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has newer 14 version and Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has Android 11. The Galaxy S25 Ultra body is way lighter and incredibly thinner than Xiaomi Black Shark 4.
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 features a much better performing CPU than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a brighter display than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because it has a much brighter display, a quite bigger display, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a higher pixels amount per display inch.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because it has more internal storage. The Galaxy S25 Ultra features just a bit longer battery duration than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a way better camera than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light captures and videos, a much better 7680x4320 video definition, a lot better resolution back camera and a lot larger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.