Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 76.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-04-28 |
| -- | 5.72 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| -- | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2457 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | -- |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3350mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than the Xiaomi Mi 6, having a general score of 90.7 against 76.5. Galaxy S25 Ultra's construction is much lighter and way thinner than Xiaomi Mi 6. Xiaomi Mi 6 has a much greater hardware performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a brighter screen than Xiaomi Mi 6, because it has a little bit more pixels per inch of display, a really bigger screen, a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 and way more display brightness. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra captures way better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi 6, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a lot larger back camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and photographs, a larger aperture for better photography in low light situations and a lot more mega pixels back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 6, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 6, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.