Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 83.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2019-03-06 |
| -- | 6.20 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.10 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and Purple |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi 9, with a 90.7 score against 83.2. The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a noticeably thinner and much lighter cellphone than Xiaomi Mi 9. The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a better looking display than Xiaomi Mi 9, because it has a little bit bigger display, a just a bit higher amount of pixels per display inch, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 and much more brightness.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Mi 9 has a much more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 9, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3300mAh. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9, because it has a way more mega-pixels back camera, a bigger diafragm aperture, a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality and a lot larger back camera sensor which provides a lot higher photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.