Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2016-05-17 |
| -- | 6.81 x 3.48 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 7.16 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 344 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8956 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4850mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than Xiaomi Mi Max, getting a score of 90.7 against 77.5. Galaxy S25 Ultra's body is much thinner and lighter than Xiaomi Mi Max. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has an incredibly better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Max, because it has a greater pixels density, a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a little larger display.
The Xiaomi Mi Max counts with a much greater hardware performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots way better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi Max, because it has a lot better video resolution, a way more mega pixels back-facing camera and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photography in poorly lited environments.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a little bit more storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Max, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with just a bit longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi Max, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.