Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-07-19 |
| -- | 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches |
| -- | 7.97 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2488 x 2224 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 417 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, with a 90.7 score against 84.3. Galaxy S25 Ultra's design is extremely lighter and extremely thinner than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4. These phones use the same Android 14 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding operating system features.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, because although it has a bit darker display, a bit lower 1440 x 3088 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better pixel amount per display inch. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 have really similar CPUs, they have 8 processing cores and a 12 GB RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, and although they both have the same 7680x4320 video resolution and a same size camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a back camera with lot more mega-pixels, better video frame rate and a bigger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features as much memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, they have equal 256 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.