Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| -- | 2016-11-01 |
| -- | 6.15 x 3.04 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Black and Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 516.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.74 | 8.69 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4070mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra is better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2, with a 90.7 score against 76. Galaxy S25 Ultra is a notably lighter and incredibly thinner cellphone than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2. These phones come with Android OS, but Galaxy S25 Ultra has 14 version while Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has an extremely better CPU than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has an inferior number of cores and less RAM memory. The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much sharper display than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a greater count of pixels per inch in the display, a bigger display and a much better 1440 x 3088 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much greater memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots much clearer videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a bigger aperture for better low-light photos and videos, a much better video resolution, a much higher 200 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has greater battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.