Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-09-08 |
| -- | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| -- | 7.58 ounces |
| -- | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a general score of 90.7, which is much better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's 81.6 general score. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has newer 14 version while Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has Android 10. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra's body is notably thinner and a lot lighter than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a much powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 6 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much sharper display than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because it has a better display density, much more display brightness, a little bit bigger display and a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution.
Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much better storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much better camera than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because it has a much better 7680x4320 video resolution, a much bigger camera sensor providing a much better image quality, a larger aperture to take better photography in poorly lited environments and a much more mega pixels camera in the back.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because it has a 5160mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.