Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 13 |
| -- | 2024-01-15 |
| -- | 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2710 x 1220 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 1800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 710 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.74 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, getting a overall score of 90.7 against 83.1. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has Android 13 version, so it provides the user a couple additional features.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G's processor is very similar to Galaxy S25 Ultra's processing unit, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy S25 Ultra has a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, because it has a just a little higher pixels density, a slightly better 1440 x 3088px resolution, a little bigger display and more display brightness.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots a lot better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light captures and videos, and they both have a camera with a 200 MP, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra also counts with a larger camera sensor.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features a superior memory for games and applications than Galaxy S25 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because it has a 2% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.