Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2019-01-15 |
| -- | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 6.56 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and Red |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.74 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, with a 90.7 score against 80.3. Galaxy S25 Ultra's body is notably thinner and noticeably lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much more vibrant screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088, a just a bit greater display pixels density and a bit larger display.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 has a lot better processing power than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 8 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy S25 Ultra has a lot better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because it has a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality, a lot bigger sensor shooting lot higher quality photographs and videos, a back camera with much more megapixels and a larger aperture.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a little bit better storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has improved battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.