Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-20 |
| -- | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.02 ounces |
| -- | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has an overall score of 90.7, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's overall score of 76.6. The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a incredibly lighter and way thinner phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has a higher pixels quantity per screen inch, a quite larger screen and a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a very superior processing unit than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a battery performance that's just as good as the Galaxy S25 Ultra one, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better images and videos in low-light environments, a lot higher video definition, a camera in the back with a way better 200 MP resolution and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor shooting way higher quality photographs and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.