Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-02-15 |
| -- | 6.07 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.00 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 is a bit better than the Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, with a global score of 82.6 against 76.2. Galaxy S25's design is much thinner and lighter than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom. Galaxy S25 has a much better screen than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, because it has a just a bit more pixels per display inch, a quite bigger screen, a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and much more brightness.
The Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom has a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy S25, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom also has a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom has a much better processing power than Galaxy S25, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy S25 counts with a greater camera than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low light images and video, it also counts with a much better resolution camera, a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom counts with improved battery lifetime than Galaxy S25, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.