Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 5.1, 5.0 |
| -- | 2014-10-15 |
| -- | 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches |
| -- | 6.49 ounces |
| -- | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 1019.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 490 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.7 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 is slightly better than the Google Nexus 6, getting an 82.6 score against 81.1. Both of these phones include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S25 has 14 version while Google Nexus 6 has Android 5.1 version, giving lots of additional features. Samsung Galaxy S25's body is notably thinner and notably lighter than Google Nexus 6.
Google Nexus 6 has a much better performance than Galaxy S25, because although it has lesser RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with an extra GPU. Galaxy S25 counts with a slightly better looking display than Google Nexus 6, because although it has a bit lower pixels density and a quite lower 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a bit bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a much greater memory to install applications and games than Google Nexus 6, because it has more internal memory. The Galaxy S25 captures greater photos and videos than Google Nexus 6, because it has a much more mega-pixels back facing camera, a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a larger diafragm aperture.
Galaxy S25 features improved battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy S25 is also a bargain compared to the other phones, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.