Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2016-10-20 |
| -- | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| -- | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 is slightly better than Google Pixel, with an 82.6 score against 80.2. Galaxy S25's body is incredibly thinner and a lot lighter than Google Pixel. The Google Pixel features a much more powerful CPU than Galaxy S25, although it has a lower number of cores and 4 GB less RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S25 features a better screen than Google Pixel, because although it has a quite worse pixel density, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a larger display.
Samsung Galaxy S25 features a much better camera than Google Pixel, because it has a larger aperture to capture better low light captures and video, a way larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality photos, a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a much better 50 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Galaxy S25 and the Google Pixel feature similar storage capacity to install applications and games, both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S25 counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel, because it has a 44% more battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Google Pixel, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.