Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| -- | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.22 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a global score of 82.6, which is slightly better than Google Pixel 3's 80 score. The Samsung Galaxy S25 is a much thinner and way lighter phone than the Google Pixel 3. The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a much better looking screen than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a just a little inferior pixels quantity per inch of display, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The Google Pixel 3 features a much faster CPU than Galaxy S25, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy S25 has a way better camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S25 also has a much larger sensor, a lot higher video definition and a camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S25 has a very superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 37% greater battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy S25, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Google Pixel 3, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.