Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| -- | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.49 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 is a bit better than Google Pixel 3 XL, having an 82.6 score against 80.7. The Samsung Galaxy S25 is a a lot thinner and much lighter phone than the Google Pixel 3 XL. The Google Pixel 3 XL features a much faster processing unit than Galaxy S25, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a better screen than Google Pixel 3 XL, although it has a just a bit less pixels per display inch, a lot worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit smaller screen. The Galaxy S25 counts with a way better camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S25 also has a lot higher 50 megapixels resolution camera, a much higher video definition and a much larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy S25 counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 64 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy S25 counts with just a little better battery life than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 17% more battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 3 XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 3 XL. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Google Pixel 3 XL, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.