Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2019-10-24 |
| -- | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 6.81 ounces |
| -- | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL has an overall score of 82.9, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S25's score of 82.6. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a very superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy S25 has a better looking screen than Google Pixel 4 XL, although it has a little less pixels per inch of display, a bit smaller display and a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
Galaxy S25 features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has more internal storage. Galaxy S25 has a greater camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures and video in low light environments, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better 50 megapixels resolution, a much higher video definition and a lot bigger sensor.
The Galaxy S25 features a little longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has an 8% greater battery capacity.
Google Pixel 4 XL not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.