Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-20 |
| -- | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S25, getting an 82.9 score against 82.6. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 4a has the older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy S25 has Android 14. Google Pixel 4a has a way better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Samsung Galaxy S25 features a more vivid display than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a little inferior number of pixels per display inch, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also counts with a little larger screen. The Galaxy S25 counts with a very superior camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way better video definition, a way better 50 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a way bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Google Pixel 4a features as much storage for applications, games, photos and videos as Samsung Galaxy S25, both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S25 counts with better battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3140mAh.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Google Pixel 4a is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.