Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2020-11-19 |
| -- | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S25, having an 87.5 score against 82.6. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has the older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy S25 has Android 14 version. Galaxy S25 has a much better looking screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G. They have the same number of pixels in each inch of screen, an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a screen with the same size.
Google Pixel 4a 5G's storage capacity for applications and games is just as good as Samsung Galaxy S25's one, they have the same internal storage. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a much faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy S25 counts with just a bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3885mAh. The Galaxy S25 has a lot better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and videos, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a way better 50 mega pixels resolution, a way higher video resolution and a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.