Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2020-10-15 |
| -- | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.33 ounces |
| -- | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has a general score of 89, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S25's score of 82.6. The Google Pixel 5 has a much faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25. They have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. Galaxy S25 features a better looking display than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a just a little less pixels per screen inch, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Galaxy S25 also counts with a little bigger display.
Google Pixel 5's storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos is just as good as Samsung Galaxy S25's one, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy S25 shoots much clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality, a way better 50 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Google Pixel 5 counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S25, because it has a 2 percent greater battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Google Pixel 5 is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.