Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-06-25 |
| -- | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.60 ounces |
| -- | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 has a global score of 82.6, which is slightly better than the Honor 50 Pro's overall score of 77. Samsung Galaxy S25 is a much thinner and noticeably lighter phone than the Honor 50 Pro. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S25 has 14 version and Honor 50 Pro has Android 11 version, providing the user some extra features and performance tweaks.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 features a much better screen than Honor 50 Pro, although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, a just a bit lower pixels density and a little bit smaller screen. The Honor 50 Pro has a much greater storage for games and applications than Galaxy S25, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
The Honor 50 Pro has a very superior processing power than Galaxy S25. They have 8 cores and a 8 GB RAM. Galaxy S25 takes slightly better videos and photos than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has a back camera with lot less megapixels, it also counts with a larger aperture and a lot better video definition.
Honor 50 Pro and Galaxy S25 have similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.