Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-02-21 |
| -- | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.00 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 416 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 is a bit better than HTC U Ultra, getting an 82.6 score against 77. The Samsung Galaxy S25 is a way thinner and way lighter cellphone than the HTC U Ultra. The Galaxy S25 counts with a better looking display than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch in the display and a little lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a bit larger screen.
The HTC U Ultra features a much powerful CPU than Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores. The HTC U Ultra has a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S25, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S25 has better battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 33 percent more battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S25 features a very superior camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also has a much better resolution back-facing camera, a lot larger sensor and a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 is a bit more expensive than HTC U Ultra, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.