Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-05-18 |
| -- | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.96 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 416 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 is a little bit better than HTC U11, with an 82.6 score against 77.6. Galaxy S25's body is a lot lighter and extremely thinner than HTC U11. The HTC U11 has a lot better hardware performance than Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy S25 counts with a better screen than HTC U11, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a quite larger screen. Galaxy S25 has a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games than HTC U11, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S25 features a much better camera than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures and videos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher resolution, a way higher 7680x4320 video quality and a much larger sensor providing a much better image quality.
Samsung Galaxy S25 features superior battery performance than HTC U11, because it has a 33% more battery size.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs a lot more than HTC U11, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the HTC U11. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get HTC U11, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.