Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| -- | 2016-03-31 |
| -- | 5.88 x 2.91 x 0.29 inches |
| -- | 5.61 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 800.00 | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 554 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 has a score of 82.6, which is a little bit better than LG G5's general score of 76.1. Galaxy S25 is a incredibly lighter and noticeably thinner cellphone than LG G5. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S25 has an older 14 version while LG G5 has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Galaxy S25 counts with a more vivid display than LG G5, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per display inch and a bit worse 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a larger screen. LG G5 counts with a much bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The LG G5 counts with a very superior hardware performance than Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and 4 less processing cores. Samsung Galaxy S25 takes a lot better pictures and videos than LG G5, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a way better image and video quality, a camera in the back with way more MP and a lot better video quality.
The Galaxy S25 features a superior battery life than LG G5, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 costs a lot more money than LG G5, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.