Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-11-09 |
| -- | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.50 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a score of 82.6, which is a bit better than the LG G7 Fit's 77 global score. The Samsung Galaxy S25 is a notably thinner and noticeably lighter cellphone than LG G7 Fit. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S25 has the previous 14 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
LG G7 Fit counts with an extremely better processing unit than Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM and less cores (although faster). The Samsung Galaxy S25 and the LG G7 Fit have incredibly similar displays, because although the LG G7 Fit has a bit smaller display and way less brightness, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a better pixel quantity per inch in the screen.
The LG G7 Fit features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy S25 counts with better battery duration than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy S25 features a much better camera than LG G7 Fit, because it has a much higher 50 MP resolution camera in the back, a larger camera aperture, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor and a much better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.