Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-06-01 |
| -- | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.71 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 is a little bit better than the LG G7 ThinQ, getting an 82.6 score against 81. The Galaxy S25 is a way thinner and noticeably lighter phone than the LG G7 ThinQ. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S25 has the older 14 version and LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie. LG G7 ThinQ features a much more powerful CPU than Galaxy S25, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
LG G7 ThinQ features a screen that's very similar to the display in Galaxy S25, because although the LG G7 ThinQ has much lower brightness and a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution. The LG G7 ThinQ features a superior memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy S25 features superior battery performance than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S25 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a back facing camera with a lot better resolution, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting much higher quality photographs and videos and a way better 7680x4320 video definition.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG G7 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG G7 ThinQ. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the LG G7 ThinQ, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.