Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-11-06 |
| -- | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 7.14 ounces |
| -- | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 800.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy S25, getting an 85.4 score against 82.6. Both of these phones have Android OS, but LG K92 has 10 version and Samsung Galaxy S25 has Android 14. LG K92 has a much powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Galaxy S25 features a much more vibrant display than LG K92, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per display inch. Galaxy S25 takes clearer photos and videos than LG K92, because although it has a lot less megapixels camera, and they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S25 also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video resolution and a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
LG K92 features a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG K92 also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG K92's battery lifetime is very similar to the Galaxy S25 one.
The LG K92 not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.